Ajay Mehta @ Ajaymahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.43353 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2018 Thana- SALAIYA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ajay Mehta @ Ajaymahto S/o Late Ramchan Mahto @ Ramchandra Prasad, R/o Vill.- Pirwan , P.S.- Salaiya, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Smt. Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 38 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
The prosecution case, in short, is that 10 liters wine is recovered.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired as the alleged recovery is made from the field situated by the side of the house of the petitioner. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43353 of 2018(2) dt.19-07-2018 2/2 in this case. It is alleged that 10 liters wine is recovered from the field in question. The field in question does not belong to the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -VII-cum- Special Judge, Excise, Aurangabad in connection with Solaiya P.S. Case No. 28 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T