Vijay Yadav @ Vijai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30450 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2024 Thana- NAURANGIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Vijay Yadav @ Vijai S/o- Mangru Yadav @ Magaru @ Magaru Yadav Village- Bodhichhapar, P.S.- Hanumanganj, District- Kushinagar, U.P. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Krishna Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Naurangiya P.S. Case No. 47 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant's father went to graze his cattle but did not return, thereafter, his dead body was found in a nala. It is further submitted that earlier the petitioner and the co-accused persons had threatened his father that he would be killed within a period of six months.

4. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. None has seen the occurrence and except

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30450 of 2025(5) dt.06-01-2026 2/3 for the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. He has further submitted that although the bail petition of the petitioner was rejected earlier, the petitioner is renewing his prayer for bail on the ground of prolonged incarceration of one and a half years. He has also submitted that other co-accused persons on exactly similar footing, have been granted bail by coordinate Benches of this Court. The charges have been framed.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner has confessed his guilt. The co-accused persons have given a vivid description of the entire occurrence, including their roles, in their confessional statements.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances especially considering the period of incarceration, as well as the fact that other co-accused persons on similar footing have been granted bail by coordinate Benches of this Court, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-II, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30450 of 2025(5) dt.06-01-2026 3/3 Naurangiya P.S. Case No. 47 of 2024, subject to the following conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

7. One of the bailors should be of local residents.

8. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available on each and every date till conclusion of the trial.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T