Vishun Yadav @ Vishundeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29638 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-565 Year-2025 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Vishun Yadav @ Vishundeo Yadav S/o Late Rewat Yadav R/o Village - Barki Kuhri, P.S - Fatehpur, District - Gaya 2.
Vinay Yadav @ Brajesh Kumar S/o Vishun Yadav @ Vishundeo Yadav R/o Village - Barki Kuhri, P.S - Fatehpur, District - Gaya 3.
Sanjay Yadav @ Hari Yadav S/o Vishun Yadav @ Vishundeo Yadav R/o Village - Barki Kuhri, P.S - Fatehpur, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL ORAL ORDER 13-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 565 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109 and 132 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The petitioner is aged about 70 years. It is stated in the F.I.R. that the police went to the house of one Ajay Kumar to arrest him in a pending case and the villagers assaulted and prevented them from discharging their duties.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner No. 1 is the father and Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are his son.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29638 of 2026(3) dt.13-05-2026 2/2
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering their presence in the village cannot be a ground for their implication and there is specific allegation against them. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 565 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.
(Ansul, J) abhishekkr/- U T