Samru Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40773 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2020 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== SAMRU YADAV Son of Sri Dhurup Yadav @ Dhruv Yadav Resident of Village- Naraipur Kewatiya, P.S.- Bagaha, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kanhaiya Kishore (App100) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Bagaha (Patkhauli) P.S. Case No. 349/2020 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code. In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40773 of 2021(2) dt.10-12-2021 2/2 Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T