Jay Shankar Prasad Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11210 of 2013 ===========================================================
1. Jay Shankar Prasad Singh S/O Sri Ram Kishore Singh, Resident Of VillageGandhihari, P.S.- Bishanpur, District- Darbhanga.
2. Bijay Kumar Sah S/O Late Mahabir Sah, Resident Of Village- Rasulpur, P.S.- Hayaghat, District- Darbhanga.
3. Raj Kumar Yadav S/O Ganesh Yadav Resident Of Village- Darhar, Police Station- Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary Government Of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Chief Secretary Government Of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna.
4. The Inspector General Of Police, (Budget), Bihar, Patna.
5. The Chairman, Central Recruitment Board-Cum-Additional Inspector General Of Police, Scrb, Patna.
6. The Senior S.P., Muzaffarpur.
7. The Senior S.P., Darbhanga.
8. The Chairman, Tirhut Board No.1, Muzaffarpur Police.
9. The Chairman, Selection Board, Uttari Mandal (North Zone), Board No.1, Darbhanga, .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jagannath Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Manish Dhari Singh, AC to GA-7 For the SSB : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Adv. Mr. Binod Kr. Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Vivek Anand Amritesh, Adv.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In this case, the petitioners are seeking relief in terms of the order passed in LPA No. 831 of 2009, operative portion whereof reads as follows:- "It is submitted by the counsel appearing on behalf of the aforementioned I.As. that sufficient time may be granted to the I.A. petitioners to comply the order passed by this Court for removing defects so as to enable them to avail the relief granted in the order passed by this Court today.
Patna High Court CWJC No.11210 of 2013 dt.01-09-2016 Having taken note of such, we are of the opinion that it would suffice if time is granted to the abovementioned I.A. petitioners to comply the order passed by this Court on 5.4.2011 within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, we make it clear that in absence of compliance of the Court's order, the abovementioned I.A. petitioners will not be entitled for any relief as granted by this Court today and the I.As. shall stand dismissed without further reference to a Bench."
It has been stated at Bar that at least two contempt applications arising from LPA No. 831 of 2009 have been rejected by this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter is pending before the Supreme Court in appeal The matter relates to the appointment of the year 2004, we have reached 2016 and, thus, it will not be proper to pass any order on merit. However, this order will be subject to the result of the SLP. With the aforementioned observation, this application is disposed of.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 3.09.2016 Transmission Date NA