Manorma Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.41623 of 2018 ======================================================
1. Manorma Devi, W/o Late Binda Singh, resident of Village- Balthora, P.S.- Nasriganj, District-Saran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 18-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends her arrest in Marhaura P.S. Case No.320 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B, 201, 120-B/34 Indian Penal Code.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased, who has no concern with the family affairs of the deceased and her husband. In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Marhaura P.S. Case No.320 of 2017, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41623 of 2018 (2) dt.18-07-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and her absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel her bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- Rohit Kr.
U T