Satyam Kumar Jha @ Satyam Jha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30615 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2018 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul ====================================================== Satyam Kumar Jha @ Satyam Jha Son of Sri Pawan Jha Resident of ward no. 29, Kayasth Tola, P.S. - Saharsa, Distt. - Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rohit Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 54 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. As per prosecution case, two unknown miscreants snatched key of motorcycle, his mobile and cash of Rs. 2,200 from the informant when informant was going to join his duty from his motorcycle.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of his criminal antecedent only and there is no incriminating articles have been recovered from the person or possession of the petitioner. There is no material save and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30615 of 2023(2) dt.14-06-2023 2/2 except the confessional statement of the petitioner. There is no eye witness of the incident. The petitioner is in jail custody since 30.01.2023. Although the petitioner has criminal antecedent of seven cases out of which he is acquitted in one case and in other cases he is on bail. The other co-accused, namely, Monu Singh has already been granted bail by the learned court below vide order dated 10.03.2022. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Supaul, in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 54 of 2018. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) shweta/- U T