Ravindra Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30285 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1234 Year-2023 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.
Ravindra Sah son of Ram Narayan Sah Village- Sakarpura, Ps- Madhepura, (Bharrahi Op), Dist- Madhepura 2.
Anil Sah son of Ram Narayan Sah Village- Sakarpura, Ps- Madhepura, (Bharrahi Op), Dist- Madhepura ... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar, A.P.P.
Mr. AN Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-12-2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make correction in the prayer portion of the bail petition.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. Petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.) P.S. Case No.1234 of 2023, registered for the offences under Sections 302, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
4. As per prosecution case, informant was working in a private firm at Hyderabad and on 18.12.2023, he received information on his phone that his mother, father and brother have been killed. Thereafter, he reached his village on 20.12.2023 and saw the dead body of his father, mother and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30285 of 2025(4) dt.19-12-2025 2/3 brother and thereafter, postmortem of the dead bodies was done. The informant alleges he inquired about the occurrence and based on suspicion implicated 24 persons alleging that they being relatives and on account of dispute relating to property have committed the murder of his family members. He further alleges that on 17.12.2023, he was threatened by co-accused Bablu Sah that his family would be killed along with him by the help of other FIR named accused persons.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that though petitioners are named in the FIR, but no specific role has been assigned to these petitioners. As per the deposition of the PW-1, Deepmala, who has claimed to be eye witnesses to the occurrence, the assailants are, namely, Amrendra, Niranjan, Sarovar, Vikas and Babloo. Similarly situated co-accused have already been allowed bail by different co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order passed in Cr.Mis.No. 28083/2024, 22407/2024 and 28004/2025. Charge sheet has already been filed. Petitioners claim clean antecedent and they are in custody since 13.11.2024.
6. Learned counsel for the State and the informant oppose the prayer for bail.
7. Considering the nature of accusation and period of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30285 of 2025(4) dt.19-12-2025 3/3 custody of these petitioners, their prayer for regular bail is allowed. Let these petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of District and Additional Sessions Judge II, Madhepura in Sessions Trial No. 352 of 2024/ CIS No.352 of 2024. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T