Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29976/2020dismissed

Ramayan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-20Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29976 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2019 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RAMAYAN SAH Son of Phulena Sah Resident of Village - Gujraulia, P.S.- Malahi, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. J.K.Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 20-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 18.08.2019 has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Kajra P.S. Case No.211 of 2019, having earlier been rejected by order dated 05.12.2019 in Cr. Misc. No. 79663 of 2019 for the alleged offences under Sections 489, 489A, 489B and 489C of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 110 counterfeit notes

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29976 of 2020(2) dt.20-01-2021 2/2 of Rs. 100 denomination, 7 ATM cards etc. It is submitted that the counterfeit notes came to light when the petitioner went to the bank to deposit the sale proceeds from his khaini shop and as such the allegation against the petitioner is improbable. The petitioner is accused in one prior case.

4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP, this Court is not inclined to take a different view of the matter from its earlier order dated 05.12.2019 aforesaid. The petition stands dismissed.

6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T