Patna High CourtMJC/1804/2015disposed

Baijnath Nirman India Pvt. Ltd. And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-24The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1804 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1807 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Baijnath Nirman India Pvt. Ltd, through its Managing Director, namely Niranjan Keshav, son of Sri Baijnath Prasad Sharma, resident of East Gandhi Maidan, P.S.+ District-Jehanabad

2. Niranjan Keshav, son of Sri Baijnath Prasad Sharma, resident of East Gandhi Maidan, P.S.+ District-Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Sri Vinay Kumar, son of Not Known to the petitioner, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Kamlesh Chaudhary, son of Not Known to the petitioner, the Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. Sri, Shailendra Kumar Pandey, son of Not Known to the petitioner, the Joint Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. Sri Gajendra Mishra, son of Not Known to the petitioner, the present Joint Secretary, Rural Works Division, Arwal, District-Arwal

5. Sri. Bed Prakash Lal, son of Not Known to the petitioner, the then Executive Engineer, Rural Works Division, Arwal, District-Arwal .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiw Kumar Prabhakar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 24-05-2017 As is evident from Annexure-A dated 23rd of January, 2013 passed by the Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar cancelling the order of blacklisting and informing of all concerned about the fact that blacklisting order of the petitioner has been quashed, now no

Patna High Court MJC No.1804 of 2015 (3) dt.24-05-2017 2/2 further action is required to be taken in the matter. Accordingly, the application is disposed of in the light of the compliance made by the respondents. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) Shageer/- U