Prashant Kumar @ Krishna Kumar Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29272 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2017 Thana- TATARPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Prashant Kumar @ Krishna Kumar Tiwari S/O Ramphal Das Resident of Village- Madhabpur, P.S.- Parbatta, District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amit Prakash, Advocate Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Tatarpur P.S. Case no. 259 of 2017 registered under sections 341, 342, 380, 384, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the petitioner along with four unknown accused persons on the point of pistol locked up the informant's wife and other lady members of the family in a room and committed loot. It is further stated that on the informant reaching home, he was also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29272 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026 2/3 locked up and the petitioner took away gold and silver ornaments besides Rs.25,000/- in cash. The informant finally states that the petitioner happens to be the nephew of his brother-in-law and even on earlier occasion cases have been lodged against him.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No such occurrence as alleged has taken place. The cause of false implication is the relationship between the parties which would be evident from the contents of the FIR itself. The petitioner is in custody since 20.12.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the allegations levelled against the petitioner in the FIR together with the relationship between the parties, taking into consideration the petitioner having remained in custody since 20.12.2025 and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Tatarpur P.S. Case no. 259 of 2017 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29272 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VII, Bhagalpur.
(Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U T