Patna High CourtMJC/3022/2016disposed

Sahdeo Kumar Alias Sahdeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through P. K. Thakur, Dgp, Bihar Patna And ORS

2019-01-23Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3022 of 2016 ====================================================== Sahdeo Kumar Alias Sahdeo Yadav, son of Sardanand Yadav, Resident of Dhobi Tola, Kagji Mohalla Danapur Cantonment, P.S. Danapur, Dist. Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through P. K. Thakur, DGP, Bihar Patna

2. Sanjay Agrawal, Collector, Patna

3. Manu Maharaj, Sr. Superintendent of Police, Patna

4. Sanjeev Kumar, The Sub-Divisional Officer, Danapur, Patna

5. Ram Pravesh Ram, the Circle Officer, Danapur, Patna

6. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, the Thana In Charge, Danapur Police Station, Patna

7. The Union of India, through G,Mohan Kumar, Secretary, Defence, Govt. of India, New Delhi

8. Name not known, the Director in Chief, Defence Property, Ministry of Defence, Govt. of India, New Delhi

9. The Cantonment Board, Danapur Cantonment, through Veeneet Kumar, the Chief Executive Officer

10. Veeneet Kumar, the Chief Executive Officer Danapur Cantonment Board, Danapur

11. Vishnu Kumar Jain

12. Anil Kumar Jain, both opposite party no. 11 and 12 are sons of late Kashi Nath Jain, resident of Dhobi Tola, Kagji Mohalla, Danapur, P.S. Danapur, Dist. Patna

13. Pradeep Kumar son of not known to petitioner

14. Savita Devi, wife of Pradeep Kumar, both opposite party no. 13 and 14 are resident of Dhobi Tola, Kagji Mohalla, Danapur Cantonment, P.S. Danapur, Dist. Patna

15. Deepa Bajwa, Principal Director, Defence Estate, Central Command, 17, Kariappa Road, Lucknow (UP) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Shankar Shran Singh GP-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 23-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Having regard to the fact that the order of this Court has been complied with, no further indulgence is required in the present proceeding. However, liberty shall be available to the

Patna High Court MJC No.3022 of 2016(4) dt.23-01-2019 2/2 petitioner to approach the appropriate authority if he is aggrieved by the decision taken by the opposite parties in compliance of the direction issued by this Court. With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U