Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42594 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -481 Year- 2017 Thana -RUNISAIDPUR District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Yadav, Son of Chandrika Prasad Yadav, Resident of south Mandiri, Police Station- Buddha Colony, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saket Tiwary Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Dubey Mr. Saket Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 481 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner happens to be father in law of the deceased (son in law) and allegation against him is of causing death of the deceased.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been made accused in this case and he has not been named in the F.I.R., his name surfaced in this case on the confession of co-accused Guddu Kumar and except that there is nothing against the petitioner.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42594 of 2018 (2) dt.23-07-2018 2/2 before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Presiding Officer FTC II, Sitamarhi, in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 481 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T