Md. Murshid @ Danttota v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29359 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-929 Year-2019 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Md. Murshid @ Danttota Son of Md. Nijam @ Khokho Resident of Village - Kursakanta, P.S.- Kursakanta, District - Araria. 2.

Md. Nijam @ Khokho Son of Late Shafique Resident of Village - Kursakanta, P.S.- Kursakanta, District - Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Neha Khatoon @ Lado Daughter of Md. Ali Imam Resident of Village - Biratnagar Ward No - 2, P.S.- Itahari, District - Morang, Nepal, At present W/O Md. Murshid @ Danttota, Resident of Village - Kursakanta, P.S.- Kursakanta, District - Araria.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Gopal Pd. Singh,APP Mr.Anil Pd. Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3.

26-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the complainant/opposite party no. 2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Complaint Case No. 929C of 2019 punishable for the offence under Section 498(A), 323, 307, 379, 149, 147 of the I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

As per the complaint case, the complainant was married with petitioner no. 1 five years ago and thereafter, it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29359 of 2020(3) dt.26-02-2021 2/3 alleged that petitioners alongwith her other in-laws members subjected her to cruetly and harassment for demand of dowry and ultimately, she was ousted from her matrimonial house. Petitioner no. 1 is husband and petitioner no. 2 is father-in-law of complainant respectively.

Earlier, notice was issued to opposite party no. 2 and opposite party no. 2 has already appeared through her counsel. A joint prayer has been made on behalf of both parties that petitioner and opposite party no. 2 have resolved the issue and decided to live together peacefully.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the anticipatory bail application of petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.1st Class, Araria in connection with Complaint Case No. 929 of 2019, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further condition that petitioner no. 1 will keep the complainant, as his wife, with full honour and dignity and will not harass or misbehave with the complainant, if any misbehaviour is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29359 of 2020(3) dt.26-02-2021 3/3 reported, the complainant would be at liberty to move before the court below for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T