Patna High CourtL.P.A/620/2014dismiss for nonprosecution

Md. Shafi Haider v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-01-25The Chief Justice-,Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.620 of 2014 ====================================================== Md. Shafi Haider S/O Late Md. Jamil Akhatar, resident of Mohalla- Parwaha, P.O.- Aundauli, P.S.- Parihar, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department [Higher Education] Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Lalit Narayan Mithila University through its Vice-Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

3. The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

4. The Finance Officer, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

5. The Principal, M.K.S. College, Chandauna, Darbhanga ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

None For the Respondent 2 to 4 :

Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha, Advocate Mr. Upendera Kumar Singh For the State : Mr. Maoj Kumar Sinha, A.C. to G.A.-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 25-01-2019 Learned counsel for the State of Bihar as well as learned counsel for the University are present. No one appears on behalf of the appellant. This situation continues to be prevailing since the very inception when the appeal had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 19th April, 2014. The case was again restored in 2018, whereafter on 18th of May, 2018, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant-petitioner. Time was granted to file counter

Patna High Court LPA No.620 of 2014(8) dt.25-01-2019 2/2 affidavit which has been filed. On 2nd of August, 2018 again, no counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant. The aforesaid repeated absence of the learned counsel, therefore, is indicative of the fact that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.

Dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ) ( Anjana Mishra, J) P.N.M./Saif U