Patna High CourtCWJC/3846/2013withdrawn

Arun Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-01-20Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3846 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Arun Rai S/O Seo Nandan Rai R/O Vill-Pohiyar Bujrug, P.S.-Desri Sahdei Bujrug O.P., Post Office.-Pohiyar, Distt-Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue , Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Bihar , Patna

3. The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur

4. The Collector, Vaishali, Distt-Vaishali

5. The L.R.D.C., Vaishali, Distt-Vaishali

6. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mahnar, Distt-Vaishali

7. The Circle Officer, Sahdei Bujrug, Distt-Vaishali

8. Mr. Binay Kumar Singh S/O Late Shiv Nandan Prasad Singh R/O VillPohiyar, P.S.-Desri Sahdei Bujrug, O.P., Post .office-Pohiyar, Distt-Vaishali .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, Advocate For the Bihar State Board of Religious Trust : Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, Sr. Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 20-01-2016 Heard Mr. Dhirendra Kumar counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ganpati Trivedi for the respondent- Bihar State Board of Religious Trust.

A counter affidavit has been filed by Mr. Trivedi wherein the order passed by the Director, Consolidation on 04.07.2011 (Annexure-B) has been enclosed. The order passed by the Presiding Officer of the Bihar Hindu Religious Trust Tribunal in case no. 11 of 2009 under Section 43 is also enclosed therewith.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3846 of 2013 (4) dt.20-01-2016 2/2 Mr. Kumar states that the petitioner was not aware of the order of the Director, Consolidation before the same was not made part of the record of this case by way of counter affidavit.

Having appreciated the stand taken by the respondent, he sought permission of the Court to withdraw this writ application so that he may take recourse to the law and challenge the order of the Director, Consolidation. In view of the aforesaid, the application, as prayed, is permitted to be withdrawn.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U