Patna High CourtMJC/207/2016dismissed

Lal Bachchan Prasad And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh The Prinipal Secretary Health Department Govt. Of

2017-03-15Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.207 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5343 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Lal Bachchan Prasad, son of late Raghu Nandan Rawat resident of village - Pahlezpur, P.O. Laxmiganj, P.S. - Goreyakothi, District - Siwan.

2. Nand Lal Ram son of late Gulab Ram resident of village - Dudhara, P.O. Dudhara, P.S. - Goreyakothi, District - Siwan.

3. Bindeshwari Mahto son of late Sipahi Mahto resident of village and P.O. - Goreyakothi, District - Siwan.

4. Ashlam Hussain son of Zahir Hussain resident of village - Mustafabad, P.O. - Mustafabad, P.S. - Goreyakothi, District - Siwan.

5. Satya Deo Prasad son of late Jagatnarayan Prasad resident of village - Muradpur Tola, P.O. - Sisai, P.S. - Goreyakothi, District - Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh the Prinipal Secretary Health Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Mr. Amir Subhani, Principal Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. R.D. Ranjan, Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. Sanjay Singh, District Magistrate, Siwan.

5. Mr. Sanjay Singh, Establishment Committee through its Chairman, Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Siwan.

6. Mr. Ibrar Ahmad, Deputy Collector, Establishment, Siwan.

7. Mr. M.R. Ranjan, District Malaria Officer, Siwan. .... .... Opp.Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. G.P10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court MJC No.207 of 2016 (3) dt.15-03-2017 2/2 15-03-2017 The Court is satisfied with regard to the steps taken by the opposite party-authorities in terms of the direction issued upon them.

In view of the same, the contempt application now stands disposed of.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) S.Pandey/- U