M/S Shivalaya Construction And Suppliers And ORS v. The H D F C Bank Ltd. And ORS
Patna High Court CWJC No.12436 of 2015 (11) dt.24-06-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12436 of 2015 ======================================================
1. M/s Shivalaya Construction & Suppliers, a partnership firm having its place of business at 1, Pragati Path, behind P.V. Complex, West Boring Canal Road, Patna - 800001 through it's partner Sunil Kumar Sharma, S/o Jhalak Deo Singh Resident of C - 302, Asu Enclave, Ara Garden Road, Jagdeo Path, P.S. Rupaspur, Patna - 800014.
2. Sunil Kumar Sharma S/o Jhalak Deo Singh Resident of C - 302, Asu Enclave, Ara Garden Road, Jagdeo Path, P.S. Rupaspur, Patna - 800014.
3. Kanishq Sharma S/o Sunil Kumar Sharma Resident of C - 302, Asu Enclave, Ara Garden Road, Jagdeo Path, P.S. Rupaspur, Patna - 800014 through his natural guardian Sunil Kumar Sharma.
4. Lakshya Sharma S/o Sunil Kumar Sharma Resident of C - 302, Asu Enclave, Ara Garden Road, Jagdeo Path, P.S. Rupaspur, Patna - 800014 through his natural guardian Sunil Kumar Sharma. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The H D F C Bank Ltd., having its registered office at HDFC Bank House, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (West), Mumbai 400013.
2. The Branch Manager, HDFC Bank LTd., Exhibition Road, Patna.
3. The Authorized Officer, HDFC Bank Ltd., Exhibition Road, Patna.
4. The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajiv Roy, G.P.5 For the Bank : Mr.Amresh Kumar Sinha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 24-06-2016 This matter has been listed under the heading 'To Be Mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel for the Bank. Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the Bank submits that the dispute has been amicably resolved in between the parties and the dues settled. The submission of learned counsel for the Bank is accepted by Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
In view of the settlement arrived at in between the contesting parties as admitted by their respective learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. Bibhash/- (Jyoti Saran, J) U