Alakh Niranjan Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 5093 of 2014 ======================================================
1. Alakh Niranjan Kumar, Son Of Jawaharlal Mahto Resident Of Village and Post - Barawat Sena, Bettiah, Police Station - Bettiah Muffasil, District - West Champaran
2. Mukul Kumar Shrivastava Son Of Sushil Kumar Shrivastava Resident Of Village and Post - Thakraha, Police Station Turkaulia, District - West Champaran
3. Thakur Amod Kumar Son Of Rupnarayan Kumar Resident Of Village - Dumari Baiju, Police Station - Patahi, District - East Champaran
4. Bharat Bhushan Son Of Bhikham Prasad Resident Of Village - Silwatiya Badago, Post and Police Station - Ramnagar, District - West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue & Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Government Of Bihar, Patna
3. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna, Through It'S Chairman
4. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna
5. The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari
6. The Additional Collector (Revenue) East Champaran, Motihari
7. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, East Champaran, Motihari
8. The Deputy Director Of Police, Muzaffarpur Range, Muzaffarpur
9. The Sub - Divisional Officer, East Champaran, Motihari
10. The Circle Officer, Adapur, East Champaran, Motihari
11. The Circle Officer, Kesaria, East Champaran, Motihari
12. The Circle Officer, Pakaridayal, East Champaran, Motihari
13. The Circle Officer, Raxaul, East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr Dhananjai Kumar, Advocate For the S t a t e :
Mr Prashant Pratap, GP II with Mr Gyan Shankar, AC to GP II For the B P S C :
Dr Ratan Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 15-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondent-State.
2 In view of the order passed by a Division Bench of this Court in LPA No 388 of 2014 wherein this Court has left it
open for the State Government to send requisition for appointment to the Commission to fill up the post and the conditions of eligibility for appointment of Amin in accordance with law, nothing would survive in the instant writ petition. 3 It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the State that other writ petition bearing CWJC No 5023 of 2014 wherein the same Advertisement No 01010114 published under Notification No 604 (4)/Patna dated 13.12.2013 was assailed by the petitioner has also been dismissed in view of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No 388 of 2014. 4 The other writ petitions also claiming the same relief, in the proceedings arising out of CWJC No 5346 of 2014 and CWJC No 5373 of 2014, have also been dismissed in view of the issue having been decided in LPA No 388 of 2014. 5 In view of the aforesaid developments, subsequent to filing of the writ petition, fate of the instant writ petition has also to be the same.
6 The instant writ petition is also dismissed in light of the order passed in LPA No 388 of 2014.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 18.02.2019 Transmission Date NA