Awadh Bihari Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11662 of 2015 ====================================================== Awadh Bihari Prasad son of Late Munshi @ Munshi Prasad resident of Village-Lachhu Bigha Mauza-Damodarpur Baldha, P.O. Mahanandpur, P.S. Nagarnausa, District-Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.
The District Magistrate, Nalanda 4.
The District Land Acquisition Officer, Biharsharif, Nalanda 5.
The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Hilsa, Nalanda 6.
The Circle Officer, Nagarnausa, Nalanda 7.
The Union of India through the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur 8.
The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur, Patna 9.
The Chief Engineer, East Central Railway, Mahendru, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha, GA-8 For the UOI :
Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Sr. CGC :
Mr. Sachin, CGC :
Mr. Lokesh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 14-07-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):
(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions directing and commanding the respondents to pay the compensation amount to the petitioners with statutory interest in lieu of the land acquired under L.A. Case No.04/2014-15 as per Right to
Patna High Court CWJC No.11662 of 2015(11) dt.14-07-2025 2/2 Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
(ii) For a direction upon the respondents to furnish the details of calculation of compensation amount.
(iii) For a direction upon the respondents to provide employment or any other entitlements to the members of affected families provided in the Second Schedule as per Section 31 of the Act. (iv) For grant of any relief/reliefs the petitioners would be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. It has been informed by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is no more and no one approached since long for filing substitution petition. As such, he prays for liberty to heirs to approach afresh if he/she/they so want.
4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U