← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34446/2019disposed

Mushtaque Ahmad Siddiqui v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34446 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-253 Year-2018 Thana- DARBHANGA COMPLAINT CASE District- Darbhanga ====================================================== MUSHTAQUE AHMAD SIDDIQUI Son of Jamil Ahmad Siddiqui Resident of Village- Kokadha, P.S.- Sakatpur, District- Darbhanga (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Shabana Perveen Wife of Mushtaque Ahmad Siddiqui Daughter of Late Masrur Alam, Presently Residing at C/o of Nasima Khatoon, VillageMirzapur, P.S.- Ali Nagar, District- Darbhanga (Bihar). ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.253 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Section 498(A0 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

As per the complaint petition, allegation against the petitioner is that after kidnapping in a hotel he made physical relationship with the complainant, married with the complainant and thereafter started demanding of Rs.02 lac and for that assaulted and ousted her . After appearance of the O.P.no.2 the matter was referred to the mediation centre and the meditation report at flag 'M' discloses that despite efforts the parties could

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34446 of 2019(4) dt.01-10-2019 2/3 not settle the dispute.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that demand for one settlement is exorbitant as she has demanded Rs.40 lac and he is headmaster in the government school. Further he admits that this is his second marriage with the complainant. Petitioner is ready to keep her with dignity and care.

On the other hand the learned counsel for the O.P.no.2 has submitted that her life was ruined by this petitioner and she is only demanding Rs.40 lac as one time settlement and the petitioner is working as Headmaster in the government school. She has also filed a maintenance case before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Darbhanga in which petitioner has not appeared.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, this application is disposed of on condition that the petitioner has to pay Rs.7,000/- (seven thousand) per month to the O.P.no.2 till any interim or final order is passed in the maintenance case filed before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Darbhanga in which the petitioner undertakes to appear very soon, earlier order granting

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34446 of 2019(4) dt.01-10-2019 3/3 provisional bail to the petitioner vide order dated 17.8.2019 shall be confirmed.

In the meantime, if the petitioner fails to pay the amount to the O.P.no.2 continuously for three months, O.P.no.2 is at liberty to move for cancellation of the bail bond of the petitioner before the court below.

With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T