Shobhi Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29222 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2026 Thana- DEEPNAGAR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Shobhi Paswan S/o Late Kamal Paswan R/o Village- Mahanandpur, P.S.- Deepnagar, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Pragya Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Deepnagar P.S. Case no.112 of 2026, registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 324(4), 352, 303(2), 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the eleven named accused persons including the petitioner herein came variously armed. The petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant with an iron rod on his head leading to grievous injuries. Others were also assaulted.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The manner of occurrence is other than what has been narrated in the FIR. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29222 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 cause of false implication is the dispute between the parties which had taken place two days ago. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He is in custody since 2.3.2026 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the direct allegation against the petitioner of having assaulted the informant with an iron rod on his head together with the corresponding injury having been found on the informant which in the opinion of the doctor was grievous in nature, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected. (Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T