Hanuman Bind And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42658 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -76 Year- 2018 Thana -BHAGWANPUR District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================
1. Hanuman Bind, Son of Jagrup Bind,
2. Tannu Bind @ Tama Bind, Son of Hanuman Bind.
3. Basmati Devi, Wife of Hanuman Bind. Resident of Village- Paharia Khurd, Police Station- Bhagwanpur, District- Kaimur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Najmul Hoda For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyavarat Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S.Case no.76 of 2018 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners, who happens to be fatherin-law, younger brother-in-law and mother-in-law is of causing death of the deceased, who happens to be daughter-in-law of the petitioner no.1 and 3.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and no specific allegation has been attributed against them. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42658 of 2018 (2) dt.24-07-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-V, Kaimur (Bhabhua) in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S.Case No.76 of 2018 subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T