Kartik Kumar Yadav @ Kartik Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39560 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-441 Year-2020 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Kartik Kumar Yadav @ Kartik Yadav S/o- Panch Lal Yadav Resident of Village- Hanuman Nagar, Bhangahi, P.S.- Narpatganj, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 27-09-2022 Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 441 of 2020(G.R. No. 3553 of 2020) lodged under Sections 406 and 420 of the I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 21.06.2022, provisional bail has been granted to the petitioner and this Court has pleased to issue notice upon the informant adding him O.P No.2 in this present case. Today O.P No.2 has appeared and filed counter affidavit. In the counter affidavit, it has been categorically stated that the petitioner has committed breach of trust and fraud with the Delivery Private

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39560 of 2021(6) dt.27-09-2022 2/2 Limited Company. He further submits that there is total claim of the company is more than Rs. 17,00,000/- and it is due to this reason, the F.I.R. has been lodged against the petitioner. The business/commercial dispute between the parties and there are claim and counter claim involved.

Upon specific query that whether charge has been framed or not. Both the parties are not in a position to inform to this Court in this regard.

Let the Trial Court is directed to confirm the bail of the petitioner 3 months after date of framing of charge and expedite the trial as early as possible within one year. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) prakashmani/- U T