Chanda v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5594 of 2016 ====================================================== Chanda Wife of Ratnendra Kumar, Resident of Village - Murliganj, Ward No. 7, Post Office and Police Station - Murliganj, District - Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.
2. The State Project Director, State Education Project Council (State Level Office), Shiksha Bhawan, Rastrbhasha Parishad Campus, Saidpur Rajendra Nagar, Patna - 800004.
3. The District Magistrate, Madhepura.
4. The District Education Officer, Primary Education and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Madhepura.
5. The District Programme Officer, Primary Education and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Madhepura.
6. The Block Education Officer - cum - Block Programme Co-ordinator, Murliganj.
7. The Controller, Kasturva Gandhi Girls school, Murliganj, District - Madhepura.
8. The Principal Kasturva Gandhi Girls School, Marliganj, District - Madhepura.
9. The Warden, Kasturva Gandhi Girls School, Murliganj, District- Madhepura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr. A. Kundu, SC-24 For respondent BEPC :
Mr. Girijesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 18-05-2018 In view of the issue involved in the present writ petition, no positive direction can be issued in favour of the petitioner. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the Project Director for consideration of his case on sympathetic consideration as the petitioner has obtained necessary qualification.
Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to file
Patna High Court CWJC No.5594 of 2016(3) dt.18-05-2018 2/2 representation. If any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the Project Director may consider and dispose of the representation expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of the representation. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merit including the issue of maintainability of the writ petition. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U