Jalil Mansoori v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No 29076 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2019 Thana- KORANSARAI District- Buxar ====================================================== JALIL MANSOORI Son of Late Idris Mansoori Resident of Village - Bagahi, P.S.- Itarhi, District - Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 11-11-2020 As of now, the Courts have not resumed normal physical hearing. The matter has been listed today for consideration through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsels are appearing and making submissions from their residence. The Court Master and Secretary are also part of this virtual Court proceedings with the aid of audio visual technology.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Mr Upendra Kumar, APP is appearing as it is submitted that the brief has been allotted to him by the Office of Advocate General.

The petitioner seeks bail in Koram Sarai Police Station (for brevity, PS) Case No 70 of 2019 instituted for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29076 of 2020(2) dt.11-11-2020 2/3 offence punishable under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code. Rs 2,27,000/- are alleged to have been snatched from the informant by unknown persons.

It is submitted by petitioner's counsel that on alleged confessional statement of co-accused Maksood Mansoori, petitioner has been implicated in this case. The implication has led to no recovery. Till date, petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade and is in custody since 07.03.2020. He is stated to be on bail in Itarhi PS Case No 95 of 2016. It is further submitted that in the other two cases, pending against him as per details contained in paragraph 3 of the petition, steps are being taken for his release in accordance with law. The learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the rival submissions, prayer for bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in Koran Sarai PS Case No 70 of 2019 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29076 of 2020(2) dt.11-11-2020 3/3 how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant proceedings today for depositing requisite Court fee and removing the defect (s), as pointed out, when called upon to do so.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U T