← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43044/2018bail granted

Shyam Bahadur Choudhary And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-07-18Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43044 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-379 Year-2017 Thana- BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE District- Begusarai ======================================================

1. Shyam Bahadur Choudhary, Son of Late Ramdev Choudhary resident of Village- Jayajpatty P.O. + P.S.- Dalsingsari, DistrictSamastipur.

2. Lila Devi @ Leela Choudhary, Wife of Shyam Bahadur Chaudhary, resident of Village- Jayajpatty, P.O. + P.S.- Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Urvashi Kumari, W/o Sarat Prakash, D/o Late Raj Kumar Rai, R/o resident of Village- Jayajpatty, P.O. + P.S.- Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur. Presently residing as Village- Manopur P.O. + P.S.- Bhagwanpur, DistrictBegusarai. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jai Vardhan Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Smt. Anita Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioners is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43044 of 2018(2) dt.18-07-2018 2/2 allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners are in-laws. They have falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioners have relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Complaint Case No. 379C/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T