Ashok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32511 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Ashok Kumar, aged about 65 years (Male), Son Of Late Raghunath Prasad, Resident Of Village- Balkishunganj, P.S.- Alamganj, Distt- Patna. 2.
Arun Kumar, aged about 61 years (Male), Son Of Late Rathunath Prasad, Resident Of Village- Balkishunganj, P.S.- Alamganj, Distt- Patna. 3.
Sanjay R. Kumar, aged about 57 years (Male), Son Of Late Raghunath Prasad, Resident Of Village- Balkishunganj, P.S.- Alamganj, Distt- Patna. 4.
Kumar Rajiv Ranjan, aged about 55 years (Male), Son Of Late Raghunath Prasad, Resident Of Village- Balkishunganj, P.S..- Alamganj, Distt- Patna. ... ... Petitioners
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
Arjun Kumar, Son Of Balindra Singh, Resident Of Ramu Chak Chhata Chowk, Bhagwanpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Distt- Muzaffapur, Presently M/S Bhartex Engineering Office, 308 Chuni Plaza, N.M.C.H. Kankarbagh, Patna. 3.
Arun Kumar Singh, Son Of Late Vijay Ranbahadur Singh, Resident Of Village- K-57/4, Varanasi, P.S.- Kotwali, Distt- Varanasi, U.P. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present application which has been filed for quashing the order dated 10.04.2023, passed by learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Patna City, Patna, in Misc. Case No. 235 of 2023 by which proceeding initiated under Section 144 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32511 of 2023(3) dt.18-11-2024 2/2 the Cr.P.C. has been made absolute against the petitioners and vacated against the private opposite parties without considering the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present quashing application filed on behalf of the petitioners is dismissed as withdrawn. (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U.K./- U T