← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13876/2014dfd for non appearance

Lal Bihari Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-01-03Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13876 of 2014 ====================================================== Lal Bihari Sharma son of Baij Nath Sharma, resident of Village- Nawtol, P.S.- Ashok Paper Mill, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Vice-Chancellor, L.N.M.U., Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga 3.

The Registrar, L.N.M.U., Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga 4.

The Principal of Maharani Kalyani College, Laheria Sarai, Darbhanga ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Manish, S.C.-5 Mr. Chandra Mohan Singh, Advocate Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha, Advocate Mr. Saket Tiwary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 03-01-2024 On call, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

2. On 05.12.2023, on call, no one appeared and accordingly a bench of this Court adjourned the matter for 12.12.2023.

3. On 12.12.2023, the learned Counsel for the petitioner appeared and wanted time to file reply to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the L.N. Mithila Univeristy.

4. On 12.12.2023, the following order was passed:- "1. Learned counsel for the L.N. Mithila University submits that a counter affidavit on behalf of the University has been filed. A copy of the same has been served on learned counsel for

Patna High Court CWJC No.13876 of 2014(9) dt.03-01-2024 2/2 the petitioner in Court today.

2. Office to place the counter affidavit of the University on record.

3. As prayed on behalf of the petitioner, to enable the petitioner to go through the counter affidavit and to file a reply, if so required, put up after one week."

5. Today, on call neither the learned Counsel for the petitioner has appeared nor there is any reply to the counter affidavit on record. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in the case.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Neha/- U