Surya Narayan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12753 of 2015 ====================================================== Surya Narayan Paswan S/o Late Palat Paswan, Resident of village- Bajitpur via Manigachhi, P.s. Manigachhi, District Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Secretary Department of Revenue & Land Reforms, Patna.
2.
The Commissioner Darbhanga 3.
The Collector, Darbhanga 4.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Darbhanga 5.
The Anchal Adhikari, Ghanshyampur, District Darbhanga 6.
The Accountant General Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amarendra Narayan, Advocate For the State ;
Mr. Zaiki Haider, AC to SC-9 For the AG :
Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Kinkar Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 31-08-2023 1.
The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "That this petition of the petitioner is being filed for issuance of writ of appropriate nature, order or direction commanding respondents to grant ACP and consequential revision and payment of pension, and other retirement benefits payable to the petitioner.
The petitioner also prays for quashing memo No.195 dated 9 March 13, so far it relates to petitioners (Petitioner's name figures at Serial no.77 of the list) containing unreasonable
Patna High Court CWJC No.12753 of 2015(2) dt.31-08-2023 2/2 objections of unverified service record between the period 7-1-09 to 09-02-09 (strike period) and absence of confidential report of three years prior to 5-12-99 and 1-1-2009 for granting benefits of ACP to the petitioner."
2.
At the outset, the learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already stood redressed, hence the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
3.
The said fact has not been refuted by the petitioner. 4.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U