← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30382/2025bail granted

Randhir Kumar Singh @ Jawanka v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-15Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30382 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2024 Thana- KALER District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Randhir Kumar Singh @ Jawanka, aged about 36 years, Gender, Male, S/o Late Uday Kumar Singh @ Uday Singh R/o vill - Kaler, P.S.- Kaler, Distt.- Arwal, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amarendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-05-2025 Heard Mr. Amarendra Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Kaler P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 144, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 332, 353, 188, 290 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4/9 of Bihar Loudspeaker Uses and Control Act.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the informant has alleged that at 2 A.M. on the music of D.J., four girls were dancing and 30-40 persons were watching it. As the police reached and demanded paper, they scuffled with the police.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30382 of 2025(2) dt.15-05-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Similarly situated coaccused persons, namely, Vishal Kumar and Bittu Kumar have also been granted pre-arrest bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Annexure 2. He further submitted that petitioner has one criminal antecedent, in which the police has submitted final form against the petitioner. On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Considering the nature of allegation made in the FIR and also the fact that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted pre-arrest bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30382 of 2025(2) dt.15-05-2025 3/3 Arwal / Concerned Court in connection with Kaler P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T