Vijay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30052 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-244 Year-2021 Thana- BARARI District- Katihar ====================================================== Vijay Yadav S/o Bhagwan Yadav R/o Mohna Chandpur, PS- Barari, (Semapur O.P), Distt- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Barari (Semapur) P.S. Case No. 244/2021 dated 13.10.2021 registered for the offence punishable u/s 307, 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant received an information about firing between the two gangs Mohan Thakur and Vijay Yadav. For verification of the said information, the informant along with police personnel reached the place of occurrence and recovered empty cartridges from the road. On being asked, the villagers disclosed the name of the accused persons. Accordingly, the F.I.R. has been lodged.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30052 of 2025(2) dt.15-07-2025 2/2 this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner neither participated in the alleged occurrence nor he has made any firing as alleged in the F.I.R. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 17.12.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 68369/2024. The petitioner has one antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 12.03.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Katihar in connection with Barari P.S. Case No. 244/2021.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T