Ravindra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42742 of 2018 Arising out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2018 Thana- AANTI, District- Gaya ====================================================== Ravindra Kumar, Son of Vinod Das, resident of Village- Dourama, Police Station- Anti and District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar No-2, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Virendra Narayan, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Anti P.S. Case No.25 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 447, 341, 323, 354 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is that at the time of returning her home, the daughter of the informant saw that her younger brother Prabhu Kumar was badly assaulted by the petitioner and when she went to save him, she was also assaulted by the petitioner and pushed her on the ground and stepped on her chest, causing injuries.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is delay of seventy days in lodging the F.I.R. and the petitioner has no specific allegation except that he tried to push her on the ground.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42742 of 2018(2) dt.24-07-2018 2/2 Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Anti P.S. Case No.25 of 2018 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- VIIth, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/-sunil U T