Patna High CourtCWJC/11823/2013dfd for non appearance

Anil Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-10-03Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11823 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Anil Kumar (Ex-Ward Councellor Ward No. 40), Son of Sri Shiv Shankar Prasad Singh, Resident of Sarvoday Nagar, Dak Bungla Road, Bishanpur, P.S. Town Thana, District - Begusarai.

2. Bijay Kumar Ray (Social Worker), Son of Late Ramji Rai, Resident of Chankya Nagar, Dak Bunglow Road, P.S. Town Thana, District Begusarai.

3. Sachin (Social Worker), Son of Suresh Pd. Singh.

4. Abdesh Pd. Singh, Son of Late Achchebat Pd. Singh.

5. Subodh Kumar Singh, Son of Late Sitaram Singh.

6. Ashish Kumar, Son of Sri Arjun Pd. Singh.

7. Gopal Saran Bhardwaj, Son of Late Baidyanath Pd. Singh. All Resident of Sarwoday Nagar, Dak Bunglow Road, P.S. Town Thana, District Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioners/Intervenor Petitioners.

Versus

1. The State of Bihar , through the Collector of the District Begusarai

2. The Collector, District Begusarai.

3. Rameshwar Sharma.

4. Sukhdeo Sharma.

5. Baleshwar Sharma.

6. Basudeo Sharma.

All Sons of Late Mato Sharma @ Mato Harhi.

All Resident of Village Siuri Pergana Bbusari, P.S. Cheria Bariyarpur, Sub-Division-Manjhaul , Munsif and Subjudge District Begusarai. .....Respondents 1st Set.

7. The Headmaster, Basic Vidyalaya Bishanpur, P.S. Town Thana District Begusarai ..... Respondents 2nd Set.

.... .... Respondents.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : None.

For the Respondents : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER --------- 03-10-2016 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ application when the case is called out while the learned counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 to 6 and 2 and 7 are present.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11823 of 2013 (3) dt.03-10-2016 2/2 On 26.09.2016 also, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ application when the case was called out.

As a result, this writ application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U