Ram Lakhan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28721 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-244 Year-2021 Thana- BARARI District- Katihar ====================================================== Ram Lakhan Yadav S/o- Hardeo Yadav R/o- Mohna Chandpur, PS-Barari, Distt- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Barari (Semapur) P.S. Case No. 244 of 2021 dated 13.10.2021 registered for the offences punishable u/s 307, 120B read with Section 34 of the I.P.C., and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant received an information about firing between the two gangs Mohan Thakur and Vijay Yadav. For verification of the said information, the informant along with police personnel reached the place of occurrence and recovered empty cartridges from the road. On being asked, the villagers disclosed the name of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28721 of 2025(5) dt.10-07-2025 2/3 accused persons. Accordingly, the F.I.R, has been lodged.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has been made accused in this case merely on suspicion. The petitioner has no concern with any gang as alleged in the F.I.R. The petitioner neither participate in the alleged occurrence nor he has made any firing as alleged in the F.I.R. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 17.12.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 68369/2024. The petitioner has three criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 20.01.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Katihar in connection with Barari P.S. Case No. 244
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28721 of 2025(5) dt.10-07-2025 3/3 of 2021.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U