Parashuram Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29126 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2025 Thana- Geedha District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Parashuram Choudhary son of Chatthu Choudhary Resident of Village -Kritpura (Birampur) PS- Gidha, District -Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate :
Mr. Rohit Kumar Sharma, Advocate :
Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-05-2025 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Gidha P.S. Case No. 16 of 2025, dated 15.01.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per allegation, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that altercation took place between the informant and petitioner's side leading to injury on both sides and filing of case and counter case and the informant's side have filed counter case subsequent to the case filed by the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29126 of 2025(2) dt.15-05-2025 2/3 Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that altercation took place between the informant and petitioner's side leading to injury on both sides and filing of case and counter case and the informant's side have filed counter case subsequent to the case filed by the petitioner bearing Gidha P.S. Case No. 15 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 117(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.
6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.
8. Considering the case and counter case and injury on both sides, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29126 of 2025(2) dt.15-05-2025 3/3 satisfaction of learned concerned Court Below, in connection with Gidha P.S. Case No. 16/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and on the following conditions:
(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.
(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) ajay/- U T