Patna High CourtCR. WJC/852/2016disposed

Vijay Prasad Verma v. The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-10Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.852 of 2016 ====================================================== Vijay Prasad Verma S/o Shri Nathuni Prasad Verma R/o Mungheriganj, Ward No.32, PS & Dist- Begusarai (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar.

2. Principal Secretary, Vigilance Bihar, Patna.

3. Principal Secretary, Revenue & Land Reform, Bihar, Patna.

4. Inspector General of Police, Economic Offences Unit, Bihar, Patna.

5. Divisional Commissioner, Monghyr

6. District Magistrate, Begusarai.

7. Superintendent of Police, Begusarai.

8. S.H.O. Begusarai Sadar Police Station, Begusarai.

9. S.H.O. Begusarai Sadar Police Station, Begusarai.

10. Om Prakash Prasad, S/o not known, Additional Collector, Begusarai. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shambhu Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 8.

10-08-2018 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application. Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel representing the respondent no. 10 are present.

This court has been informed that during pendency of the writ application investigation in Begusarai Sadar P.S. Case No. 335 of 2016 has already been completed, a charge-sheet was filed and now cognizance has been taken calling upon the petitioner to face trial. In the aforesaid view of the matter, it appears that the writ application has become infructuous. Despite

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.852 of 2016 (8) dt.10-08-2018 notice in the general cause list, Since nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application this court has reason to believe that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.

The writ application is thus disposed of as not pressed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U