Gajendra Prasad Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7445 of 2024 ====================================================== Gajendra Prasad Sah Son of Jugal Sah Resident of village- Barahi, P.S.- Parihar, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Addl. Chief Secretary, Department of Land Reforms and Revenue, Govenment of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Director, Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.
4.
The Deputy Collector, Sitamarhi.
5.
The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sitamarhi Sadar, Sitamarhi. 6.
The Sub-Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Sitamarhi Sadar, Sitamarhi.
7.
The Sub-divisional Police Officer, Sitamarhi Sadar, Sitamarhi. 8.
The Circle Officer, Parihar, Sitamarhi.
9.
The S.H.O. Parihar, Sitamarhi.
10.
The Circle Amin Parihar, Sitamarhi.
11.
Hakim Raeen son of Rasul Raeen, Resident of village- Barahi, P.S.- Parihar, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar Sinha, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Standing Counsel (8) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 15-07-2024
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this writ application is being filed for a direction upon the respondents to remove the encroachment over the land of Bihar Government, Common PWD Road situated at village-Barahi, P.S.-Parihar near Gobarhiya pul bearing Thana No. 129, Khata No. 1092, Khesra No.1346, which
Patna High Court CWJC No.7445 of 2024(2) dt.15-07-2024 2/2 has been illegally encroached by the private respondent Hakim Raine son of Rasul Raine, village-Barahi, P.S.-Parihar, District-Sitamarhi (R-11), by constructing his hut."
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.
3. It is needless to state that in case appropriate representation is filed by the petitioner, before the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, within a period of two weeks from today, the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, shall ensure that the final order, passed by the Circle Officer, Parihar, DistrictSitamarhi, in connection with Encroachment Case No.04 of 2022 is enforced, forthwith, in case there is no other legal impediment.
4. The writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U