Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1692 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2018 Thana- KOCHAS District- Rohtas ====================================================== RANJAN KUMAR Son of Ganesh Singh Resident of Village-Sheopur, P.S.- Kochas, District-Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Babu Nandan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2021 Heard both parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Kochas P.S. Case No. 203 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 326 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 11.12.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 79603 and 2019 with liberty to file fresh petition after a period of eight months.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is case and counter case. Other co-accused have already been granted bail by this Hon'ble Court vide orders dated 26.03.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18076 of 2019 and dated 15.04.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23691 of 2019. Petitioner is in custody

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1692 of 2021(3) dt.03-03-2021 2/2 since 20.08.2019 and bears clean antecedent. Chargesheet has already been submitted.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Sasaram, Rohtas in connection with Kochas P.S. Case No. 203 of 2018, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T