Chintamani Devi @ Chaintamunni Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.58758 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -206 Year- 2017 Thana -MADHUBAN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Chintamani Devi @ Chaintamunni Devi wife of Ram Ekbal Sah
2. Ram Ekbal Sah son of Late Madho Sah
3. Shani Kumar son of Ram Ekbal Sah All residents of Village - Sawangiya, P.S. - Madhuban, District - East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Singh -5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 05-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Madhuban P.S. Case No. 206 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-498A, 304B, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are parents in law whereas petitioner No. 3 is Devar of the deceased. From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58758 of 2017 (2) dt.05-12-2017 2/2 sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Madhuban P.S. Case No. 206 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, East Champaran, Motihari subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T