Raghunandan Sardar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33684 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2015 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

RAGHUNANDAN SARDAR SON OF LATE ASHARFI SARDAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DEPRAKHA, PS- TRIVENIGANJ, DISTTSUPAUL 2.

ARVIND SARDAR SON OF RAGHUNANDAN SARDAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DEPRAKHA, PS- TRIVENIGANJ, DISTT- SUPAUL 3.

ASHOK SARDAR SON OF RAGHUNANDAN SARDAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- DEPRAKHA, PS- TRIVENIGANJ, DISTT- SUPAUL 4.

PRABHASH KUMAR SON OF DINESH SARDAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SUNDAR BISHANPUR, PS- KUMARKHAND , DISTTMADHEPURA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Naresh Kumar Mehta, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-07-2023 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, petitioners along with other accused persons are said to have committed murder of the informant's son.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to local politics and enmity.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33684 of 2023(2) dt.24-07-2023 2/2 The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. It is further submitted that after investigation, the final form has been filed by the police against the petitioners, but learned Court below differing the final form took cognizance against the petitioners. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as the final form has been filed against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 212 of 2015, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T