Manohar Rai @ Manohar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31705 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72245 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2024 Thana- DORIGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== Manohar Rai @ Manohar Ray S/O Late Lalit Rai Village- Chakiya, P.S.- Doriganj, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-07-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner was granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by an order dated 22-3-2025 in Cr. Misc No. 72245 of 2024, with a condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father namely Lalit Rai. 3.

It is next submitted that father of the petitioner died on 10-12-2009, as would manifest from Annexure-2 to the supplementary affidavit. It is further submitted that inadvertently in Cr. Misc No. 72245 of 2024, the word "late" was not prefixed before the name of the father of the petitioner. 4.

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31705 of 2025(4) dt.18-07-2025 2/2 petitioner thus submits that the instant modification application has been filed seeking modification of the order dated 22-32025 in Cr. Misc No. 72245 of 2024 for modifying the condition of bail since father of the petitioner had died much before. 5.

Learned APP also does not dispute the submission made by the the learned counsel appearing on behalf the petitioner in view of the Annexure-2 to the supplementary affidavit.

6.

After hearing the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, para-7 of the order dated 22-3-2025 in Cr. Misc No. 72245 of 2024 is modified to read as "one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his son, Chanchal Kumar, who has sworn the affidavit, instead of father of the petitioner, late Lalit Rai".

7.

It is made clear that if the petitioner surrenders on or before 28-7-2025, in that event his bail bonds shall be accepted.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T