Rani Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30534 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2025 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== Rani Devi W/o- Dharmendra Das Resident of Village- Sugani, Police StationSambhuganj, District- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Shalini Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2025 Today the matter was listed under the heading "To Be Mentioned".

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. Case No. 105 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

4. The prosecution case, in short, is that, due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry, daughter of the petitioner was done to death by her in-laws.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30534 of 2025(2) dt.13-05-2025 2/2 the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is married sister-inlaw of the deceased and she was living with her husband. The petitioner is separate in mess and business from the husband of the deceased. It is further submitted that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. No specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner. It is next submitted that husband of the deceased is in judicial custody. The petitioner is in custody since 04.03.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent.

6. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. Case No. 105 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T