← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15413/2015dismissed

Tarkeshwar Nath Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-09-01Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15413 of 2015 ====================================================== Tarkeshwar Nath Pandey son of Late Indradeo Pandey resident of villageBlilauti, Post Office-Blilauti, Police Station- Sahpur, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat Building, Bailey Road, Patna-800001.

2.

The Bihar State Housing Board, 6 Mangles Road, Patna. 3.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Housing Board, 6 Mangles Road, Patna 4.

The Secretary, Bihar State Housing Board, 6 Mangles Road, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Roy Shivaji Nath, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-09-2023

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this is an application praying for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to grant the benefits of Assured Career Progression Scheme to the petitioner as admissible to the employees of the respondent- Board inter-alia the following:

Reliefs:- (i) The respondents be directed to grant ACP benefits to the petitioner and accordingly integrate the petitioner's

Patna High Court CWJC No.15413 of 2015(2) dt.01-09-2023 2/2 pension reckoning with the same benefits;

(ii) The respondents be directed to grant all the consequential benefits to the petitioner as he is found legally entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case;"

2. After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent-authorities for redressal of his subsisting grievances, if any. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U