Ramu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30159 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-338 Year-2025 Thana- KHARIK District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Ramu Kumar S/O Kailash Mandal R/O Vill- Jhanw, P.S- Kharik, DistBhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 140(1), 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the minor son of the informant went for coaching but he did not return. The informant suspects that he was having a dispute with one Ramu Kumar. He might have killed his son.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of F.I.R. itself it is clear that this case is based only on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30159 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 2/2 suspicion. There is no eye witness to the occurrence. It has further been submitted that during course of investigation, the petitioner was apprehended and has given his confessional statement. Save and except the confessional statement of the petitioner, there is nothing against him. No recovery was made from his possession. He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 08.11.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-3rd, Naugachia, Bhagalpur in connection with Kharik P.S. Case No. 338 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T