← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9900/2012withdrawn

Rajive Ranjan And ORS v. Bihar Staff Selection Commissi

2023-12-12Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9900 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.

Rajive Ranjan Son Of Arvind Kumar Resident Of Village And P.O.- Kamta, District- Sheikhpura 2.

Sheo Shankar Prasad Son Of Late Devnandan Prasad Resident Of VillageKathanpura, P.O.- Ajaypur, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda 3.

Niranjan Kumar Son Of Rajendra Prasad Singh Resident Of VillageChhatna, P.O.- Parsa Bazar, District- Patna 4.

Brajbhushan Kumar Son Of Gupteshwar Sharma Resident Of Professor Colony Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad 5.

Amrendra Kumar Son Of Chandradeo Singh Resident Of Village- Rahatpur, P.S.- Baliya, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Chairman, Vetenary College, Patna.

2.

Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Vetenary College, Patna 3.

Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Vetenary College, Patna 4.

The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Patna Secretariat, Patna 5.

Principal Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna Secretariat, Patna 6.

Director-In-Chief, Health And Family Welfare Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna Secretariat, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Prakash, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Lalit Kishor, AAG 1 For BPSC : Mr. Satyatri Bharti, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the BPSC as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9900 of 2012(3) dt.12-12-2023 2/2

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U