Ram Bilash Ram And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.63669 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -310 Year- 2017 Thana -RUNISAIDPUR District- SITAMARHI ======================================================
1. Ram Bilash Ram (PDS) son of Late Ram Bahadur Ram, resident of Rupauli, P.S Runi Saidpur, District Sitamarhi.
2. Ajay Kumar (Driver), son of Satya Narayan Sah, resident of VillageMadadeiya, P.S. Meenapur, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajeev Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 310 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 7 of the E.C. Act.
In the FIR, it is alleged that on the date of occurrence 11 bags of rice each containing 50 kg allegedly belonging to PDS dealer Ram Bilash Ram, has been recovered from a tempo without registration number.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that 11 bags of rice belonged to villager Devendra Jha who is a farmer. The same was taken on tempo for sell by petitioner no. 2. The name of petitioner no. 1 has been taken due to village politics. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners, named above, in the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63669 of 2017 (3) dt.08-02-2018 2/2 event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 310 of 2017, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C. with further conditions (bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,
(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every dated fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioners and (3) if the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) khushbu/- U T