Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39793/2021withdrawn

Santosh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-07Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39793 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2021 Thana- DANDARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== SANTOSH PASWAN Son of Khaltu Paswan @ Ram Sevak Paswan Resident of Village - Rajopur, P.S.- Dandari, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-03-2022 Heard the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the Pairvikar of the case has not given correct information with respect to the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and as such incorrect statement has been made in Para-3 of the bail petition. However, learned counsel for the petitioner on his own endeavour came to know that the petitioner has been made accused in some other cases as what has been stated in Para-3 of the bail petition, and in such circumstances, he seeks permission to withdraw the application filed on behalf of petitioner. Law is well settled with regard to false averments in the pleading are sufficient to attract Chapter XI of the I.P.C. In this case Pairvikar of the petitioner has knowingly and deliberately made false statement/information in paragraph No.3

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39793 of 2021(4) dt.07-03-2022 2/2 of the present bail application. This practice of having made a false statement incorporated in an affidavit filed before Court should always be deprecated and entail appropriate legal action against the accused persons.

In view of the above submission, the application filed on behalf of the petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner, if so advised, may file fresh application without suppressing any fact on affidavit. The petitioner may utilize the certified copy of the impugned order etc. to avoid any further delay. If such application is filed, the office is directed to place the present case along with fresh bail application.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T