Geeta Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8148 of 2013 =========================================================== Geeta Devi Wife Of Sri Umesh Kumar Resident Of Mohalla - New Delian, Ward No. 24, At P.O. And P.S. Dehari - On - Sone, District - Rohtas At Present A.N.M., Urban Family Welfare Centre, Sub Divisional Hospital, Dehari - On - Sone, District - Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary Cum Commissioner To Government, Department Of Health, Bihar, Patna

2. The Director In Chief, Health Services, Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Rohtas, At Sasaram

4. The Civil Surgeon Cum C.M.O., Rohtas At Sasaram

5. The Additional Chief Medical Officer, Rohtas At Sasaram

6. The District Immunisation Officer, Rohtas At Sasaram

7. The Deputy Superintendent, Sub - Divisional Hospital , Dehari - On - Sone, District - Rohtas

8. The Medical Officer, I/C, Primary Health Centre, Dehari - On - Sone, District - Rohtas .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gyan Prakash, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. G.S. Prasad, GP-1 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner, in this writ application, prays for payment of uniform allowance for the year 2012-13 and allotment of work against the sanctioned post.

The petitioner was appointed as an A.N.M. by the competent authority and joined the said post on 15.6.1985 and on the day of fling of the application, she was A.N.M. in the Urban Family Welfare Center, Sub-Divisional Hospital, Dehari-on-Sone (Rohtas).

Patna High Court CWJC No.8148 of 2013 dt.16-05-2016 She has made a complaint that she has not been paid uniform allowance for the period 2012-13 without any rhyme or reason. Looking to the prayer made by the petitioner, the Authority concerned is directed to examine the claim of the petitioner, if she is entitled to the benefit, that should be paid to her without unnecessary delay. For the convenience, the petitioner will file a detailed representation before the Authority concerned who will dispose of the same within a period of three months from the date of filing of representation.

With the aforementioned observation and direction, this application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 18.5.2016 Transmission Date