Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45474 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -56 Year- 2018 Thana -SAHAJITPUR District- SARAN ====================================================== Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Sah, son of Sushil Sah, resident of village- Moti Chapra, P.S.- Sahjitpur, District- Saran (Chapra). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Md. Nazir Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sahjitpur P.S. Case No.56 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 354, 354(B) and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that father of the petitioner also filed complaint case No.1696 of 2018. The instant case has been filed by the informant in retaliation of aforesaid case levelling general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner that he tried to outrage her modesty after pressing her mouth. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Sahjitpur P.S. Case No.56

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45474 of 2018 (2) dt.13-08-2018 2/2 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-6th, Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- Rohit Kr.

U T